Adam's Legal Newsletter

Home
Archive
About
New
Top
Discussion
The least significant cases of the decade
A scientific analysis.
May 28 • 
Adam Unikowsky
10
5
On Disney v. DeSantis
Why Florida has violated Disney's constitutional rights.
May 15 • 
Adam Unikowsky
48
21
Why does doctrine get so complicated?
(Or does it?)
May 8 • 
Adam Unikowsky
15
7
April 2023
Does standing follow the merits?
Often. Not always.
Apr 30 • 
Adam Unikowsky
17
8
Reflections on AHM v. FDA
The rule of law prevails.
Apr 22 • 
Adam Unikowsky
34
25
Mifepristone and the rule of law, part IV
The Fifth Circuit's merits analysis was as wrong as its standing analysis.
Apr 16 • 
Adam Unikowsky
26
44
Mifepristone and the rule of law, part III
The Fifth Circuit's decision is wrong too.
Apr 13 • 
Adam Unikowsky
66
29
Mifepristone and the rule of law, part II
The district court's decision is wrong. It must be reversed.
Apr 10 • 
Adam Unikowsky
97
53
Preserving religious freedom in the workplace
Why the Supreme Court should resolve Groff v. DeJoy in line with traditional conceptions of religious freedom
Apr 4 • 
Adam Unikowsky
4
4
March 2023
Three lawyers and a robot walk into a bar...
and debate motions practice.
Mar 25 • 
Adam Unikowsky
1
2
The Last of Us: Part II
Yep, this one's about Franklin Pierce.
Mar 17 • 
Adam Unikowsky
4
4
The Last of Us
Everything you ever wanted to know about extremely long-serving judges but were afraid to ask
Mar 10 • 
Adam Unikowsky
3
8
© 2023 Adam Unikowsky
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing