Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EMS's avatar

Your analysis of the judge's opinion does seem to prove that the judge's decision is not based on a neutral analysis of the law but is instead based on his personal beliefs against abortion. He departs from basic legal principles, from standing to the statute of limitations, in order to reach a decision that is not supported by any reasoned legal analysis.

Expand full comment
Stephanie Bamberger's avatar

While I understand your statement that the judge’s personal beliefs shouldn’t be held against him, his anti-abortion beliefs are THE reason he was appointed to the federal bench and why the plaintiffs in this case established their association in Amarillo so that he would hear the case. They knew he would rule the way he did. Anyone paying attention knew he would rule the way he did.

Expand full comment
51 more comments...

No posts